technical authoring Archives | Shufrans TechDocs Home // technical authoring Archives | Shufrans TechDocs

For anyone working in technical documentation, the standard playbook for dealing with disruptive technology is entirely predictable. When a new tool emerges that promises to fundamentally change how text is generated, translated, or structured, legacy standard-bearers inevitably retreat into the bunker.

We see it whenever a new advisory paper drops on AI and controlled authoring. Rather than engaging with how modern language models can be harnessed to assist technical authors, the traditional response spends pages warning against the sky falling—highlighting hallucinations, data leaks, and the irreplaceable brilliance of human gatekeepers.

It is tempting to dismiss this as much ado about nothing: a classic exercise in corporate self-preservation from groups whose entire model relies on maintaining rigid control over a heavily guarded specification. But if we want to move past the panic, we need to look at what is actually happening behind closed doors.

The Industry Reality: Closing the Door vs. Opening the Hood

Let’s be entirely candid. If you feed raw, unvetted technical specifications into a generic consumer chatbot and hope for an airtight, compliant maintenance manual, you are going to be disappointed. Out of the box, large language models favour synonyms, run-on sentences, and creative prose—three things that will instantly trigger a failure in any controlled language audit.

That is the grain of truth in the defensive posturing. Unchecked AI is a liability.

However, pretending that technical writers and engineers are not already experimenting with AI behind closed doors is willful blindness. Documentation teams are pressed for time, overwhelmed by localization backlogs, and drowning in complex engineering updates. They are using AI to draft, summarise, and restructure content whether standard bodies approve of it or not.

The real question isn’t whether AI will touch technical documentation. It’s whether we are going to govern it intelligently or leave authoring teams to figure it out in the wild.

From Fear to Architecture: The Real Role of AI in Controlled Authoring

True technical documentation governance isn’t about locking the door against new technology; it’s about building the guardrails that make technology actually useful.

Instead of treating AI as a replacement for human judgment, we should be treating it as a high-velocity drafting assistant. When properly architected, modern language models can be constrained to serve controlled authoring rather than disrupt it:

• Custom Grammars and Local Guardrails: By pairing fine-tuned, localised models with strict dictionaries and syntax rulebooks, organisations can filter out non-compliant structures before a human writer even opens the draft.

• Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Approved Corpora: Instead of letting an LLM generate instructions from its general training data, restricted systems pull exclusively from validated maintenance manuals, reducing errors and protecting proprietary data.

• Accelerating the Routine: The hardest part of technical authoring is often turning dense, sprawling engineering notes into a clean baseline structure. AI excels at heavy-lifting that first iteration, leaving the expert technical writer free to apply nuance, safety checks, and strict linguistic compliance.

The Verdict

The future of technical writing doesn’t belong to those who issue warnings from behind closed gates, nor does it belong to a reckless free-for-all of unverified prompts. It belongs to organisations that combine rigorous standards with smart, governed automation.

It is time to stop panicking about what machines cannot do, and start engineering how they can help us do our best work.

How are your documentation teams navigating the line between AI experimentation and strict compliance standards?

Ready to eliminate ambiguity in your manuals?

Shufrans TechDocs helps engineering teams across high-consequence industries—from aerospace and defense to heavy industrial machinery—implement practical ASD-STE100 compliance through specialised training and governance consulting. Contact us to discuss your documentation workflow.

When an engineering firm releases a complex system, product variants quickly follow. The core architecture remains identical, but a control panel shifts, a valve location moves, or a feature appears on one variant and not the next.

Documentation follows the same chaotic cycle. Early on, the technical author copies the previous manual, edits what changed, and ships. That approach holds up until the number of variants multiplies, at which point systemic symptoms appear. The same pressure-relief valve is described one way by the mechanical team and another by the electrical group. A safety correction made for a high-priority client never reaches the technical files being built alongside it. Superseded specifications survive in sections nobody reread.

Standardising the layout and table of contents solves part of the problem. But when technical manuals are written in natural English, layout standardisation only creates an orderly wrapper for unconstrained ambiguity.

True technical standardisation requires controlling the language itself through Simplified Technical English. Here are the core pillars required to fix documentation drift at the authoring stage.

Enforce Controlled Terminology and Single Meanings When the same physical component appears under different names across a product family, readers assume they are dealing with different parts. A retention bracket can easily pick up four distinct labels across three variant manuals without anyone deciding it should. Designate a single, approved term of record for every asset, part, and action. STE rules dictate that every approved word must have only one meaning, and every concept must be represented by only one term. As soon as a part carries synonyms, users hesitate, internal consistency collapses, and downstream localisation costs multiply.

Standardise Procedural Voice and Sentence Shape Natural technical writing varies wildly depending on who is at the keyboard. One writer prefers passive descriptions, another uses imperative commands mixed with conditional clauses. Enforce structural rules for sentence design. Instructions must always begin with an approved imperative verb, placing the action in the first word. Descriptive sentences must keep the active voice and name the object that acts. By fixing sentence patterns across the document, technical readers stop parsing ambiguous grammatical structures and focus entirely on operational changes.

Standardise Safety Information and Hazard Formats Safety warnings are the one area where writer discretion introduces lethal exposure. When safety messages vary across models of the same family, it creates severe compliance liabilities during third-party safety audits or product liability disputes. Combine standard safety hierarchy rules with strict STE constraints.

Standardise Baseline Content Blocks A maintenance procedure or system check that applies across a dozen variants does not need to be drafted twelve times by twelve different engineers. Isolate approved, STE-compliant blocks of procedural text and turn them into modular standard content. When a function behaves identically under the same conditions, the verified sentence structure becomes a reusable master asset. If a specific operational threshold differs on a variant, change only that parameter and leave the rest of the certified sentence untouched.

Establish Upstream Writing Rules Over Downstream Localisation Many engineering organisations treat technical standardisation as a translation problem, fixing errors only after the manual has been written and sent overseas. By then, the structural ambiguity is already baked into the source text. Publish an internal style guide based on ASD-STE100 before writing begins. Define approved technical verbs, prohibit vague modifiers, and mandate strict sentence length limits. When the source text is written under strict linguistic governance, downstream translation and technical audits require a fraction of the time and budget.

Standardising technical manuals comes down to imposing rules that govern how a product family is described from the ground up. With over twenty years of specialised experience delivering Simplified Technical English implementation and training across complex industrial sectors, Shufrans TechDocs helps engineering teams eliminate documentation drift at the authoring stage.

With an STE-based standard in place, authoring time drops, review cycles shorten, and the quality gap between different engineering teams disappears. More importantly, technical files stop triggering non-conformities during regulatory audits, ensuring that your operational documentation matches the absolute precision of the hardware you build.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

Engineering organisations subject every physical component, software algorithm, and manufacturing process to rigorous validation. Yet, the instructions guiding how operators, technicians, and auditors interact with those systems are frequently left to individual writing styles.

When standard operating procedures (SOPs), maintenance manuals, and regulatory dossiers rely on conversational phrasing, they introduce controlled variation into environments that demand absolute predictability. In high-consequence sectors like aerospace, medical devices, automotive, and heavy industry, that linguistic gap is a major operational liability.

The Structural Vulnerability of Natural Language

Technical writers and engineers are experts in their fields, but natural language is built for interpretation rather than precision. When drafting documentation without structural constraints, standard writing habits routinely introduce three specific vulnerabilities:

• Lexical Inconsistency: Different authors use multiple terms for the same component or action. One section calls for disconnect, another for detach, and a third for unplug, creating confusion for readers and rendering translation memories inefficient.
• Subjective Parameters: Words like appropriate, sufficient, frequent, or excessive introduce personal judgement into instructions that require measurable thresholds. A technician’s definition of “frequent maintenance” rarely matches an auditor’s interpretation.
• Complex Syntax: Long, multi-clause sentences bury the primary action, increasing cognitive load under operational pressure and elevating the risk of procedural error.

During an audit or regulatory review, these inconsistencies translate directly into audit non-conformities, review bottlenecks, and prolonged approval cycles.

Bridging the Gap with ASD-STE100

To eliminate this friction, organisations must treat technical authoring as a controlled engineering process. This requires implementing ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English)—an international specification originally engineered for complex aerospace systems to remove linguistic uncertainty.

ASD-STE100 brings the same methodological discipline to text that engineers apply to hardware design:

• A Standardised Vocabulary: A controlled dictionary limits each word to a single approved meaning and part of speech, eliminating unauthorised synonyms and ambiguity.
• Strict Length Limits: Procedural sentences are restricted to a maximum of 20 words, while descriptive text is capped at 25 words, ensuring information is processed quickly and accurately.
• Explicit Action-Oriented Phrasing: Writers must use the imperative mood for instructions, ensuring the required task is unmistakable and direct.

The Commercial Impact of Linguistic Governance

Adopting a controlled language standard transforms technical documentation from an administrative bottleneck into an asset for operational excellence. When source texts adhere to a predictable grammatical baseline:

1. Review Cycles Accelerate: Quality assurance and regulatory teams spend less time untangling vague phrasing and more time evaluating core compliance.
2. Localisation Costs Drop: Clean, standardised source text maximises translation memory reuse and optimises machine translation accuracy across global markets.
3. Safety Risks Decrease: Operators in the field execute maintenance procedures without second-guessing ambiguous instructions.

Securing Your Documentation Pipeline

Investing in physical safety systems while ignoring the clarity of the instructions governing them leaves a critical vulnerability open. Standardising authoring output protects your compliance posture, safeguards your audit readiness, and ensures your documentation matches the quality of your engineering.

If your organisation is ready to eliminate documentation ambiguity and streamline compliance workflows, let us evaluate your technical text.

Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session to discuss how linguistic governance can protect your engineering operations.

In every high-hazard organisation—whether in MedTech, Energy, Aerospace, or Heavy Industry—leadership invests heavily in immaculate safety management systems, robust quality frameworks, and exhaustive compliance audits. Yet, despite these multi-million-dollar safety structures, costly operational errors and audit non-conformances still occur on the shop floor, the rig, and the cleanroom.

The root cause rarely lives in your formal policy manuals. It lives in your Unwritten Ground Rules (UGRs)—those pervasive, unvoiced workplace norms of “this is the way we do things around here.”

While UGRs typically get discussed in the context of leadership culture or safety behaviours, their most dangerous manifestation is entirely invisible. They quietly dictate how your engineering teams write, review, and approve technical documentation.

The Gap Between the Quality Manual and the Technical Page

Walk into any engineering department or technical publications office, and you will find formal processes designed for absolute precision. But look closer at the actual text inside the standard operating procedures, maintenance instructions, and device user manuals.

Deeply ingrained legacy UGRs silently shape what ends up on the page. Unspoken habits dictate that “if it sounds complex, academic, and dense, it must be rigorous” or “we’ve always written our technical manuals this way, so do not rock the boat.”

When these cultural norms take over, authors default to ambiguous, open-ended phrasing. Terms like appropriate, sufficient, adequate, or as needed slip past review boards unchallenged. Why? Because within the existing departmental culture, challenging a senior engineer’s convoluted phrasing or breaking a legacy template feels like an unnecessary battle. Silence becomes the path of least resistance.

When Linguistic Ambiguity Becomes an Operational Liability

The moment an ambiguous document leaves the engineering office and lands in the hands of a field technician, a quality inspector, or a clinical application specialist, that cultural silence turns into operational risk.

When a maintenance manual instructs a technician to “tighten the assembly to an appropriate torque” or “verify that the component is sufficiently cleared of debris,” it strips away objective reality. It forces skilled operators into split-second subjective guesswork during high-pressure execution phases.

This is where operational variance spikes. Human error during critical tasks rarely stems from incompetence. Instead, it stems from instructions that leave room for interpretation. Vague writing invites procedural drift, which in turn leads to safety incidents, audit findings, and catastrophic downtime. Poorly written technical instructions are not just a copyediting oversight. They are a direct symptom of a deeper cultural silence where cross-functional teams hesitate to demand absolute clarity.

Linguistic Governance as Cultural Intervention

Fixing this requires moving past the superficial view that technical authoring is just a box-checking exercise or a matter of running text through basic grammar software. True risk mitigation demands Linguistic Governance.

Implementing a controlled standard like Simplified Technical English is not merely about enforcing a vocabulary list. It is a systematic cultural and operational intervention that breaks the legacy habit of hiding behind complexity. By restricting a verb to a single meaning, eliminating jargon, and banning ambiguous modifiers, Simplified Technical English forces cross-functional alignment.

When engineering design, technical writing, and field operations operate under a single standard of absolute linguistic clarity, the cultural dynamic shifts. Authors no longer guess what an engineer meant, and technicians no longer gamble on what an instruction implies. It establishes shared ownership over safety-critical data.

Are legacy documentation habits driving up compliance variance in your engineering workflows? Let’s audit your linguistic risk.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

UGRs® (Unwritten Ground Rules) was created by Steve Simpson, a registered trademark.

Product manuals and instructions for use carry dozens of items that exist simply because a regulation demands them. When a company ships products to more than ten markets, certification marks, warning texts, and disposal notices multiply into hundreds of combinations. If an organisation does not maintain strict governance over these items, a single rule change can take days just to scope out, and omissions usually surface only at customs or during market surveillance when the cost of fixing them has already escalated.

The Hidden Cost of Linguistic Ambiguity in Manuals

While regulatory compliance is often treated as a logistical checklist, the root cause of most compliance failures is linguistic. Standard English is full of nuance, synonyms, and subjective phrasing that invites misinterpretation. When technical authors write warning notices, installation steps, and safety directives without strict controls, they create hidden liabilities. Translators struggle to find exact equivalents, local authorities raise flags over vague compliance text, and end users face safety risks.

Why ASD-STE100 is a Proven Regulatory Control Mechanism

To solve this, companies need more than a content repository. They need strict linguistic governance. ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English) was specifically designed to eliminate ambiguity in complex technical documentation.

• Controlled vocabulary restricts words and enforces rigid grammatical rules so that every sentence has one unambiguous meaning.

• Reduced translation friction ensures that standardised source text translates cleanly into multiple languages, eliminating the costly iterations and review cycles that plague multi-market product manuals.

• Agile regulatory updates allow documentation teams to update precise terminology at the source without rewriting entire manuals when regulations change across global markets.

The Training Delivery Standard

High-compliance industries do not need software shortcuts or generic grammar checklists. They require rigorous, proven linguistic architecture. Shufrans TechDocs delivers the professional implementation and mastery standards required for organisations to embed ASD-STE100 permanently into their operations.

• Master the definitive specification through structured, industry-proven training tailored for engineering and technical documentation leaders.

• Eliminate costly ambiguities at the authoring source to protect your products against customs delays and compliance hazards.

• Streamline global localisation by turning product manuals into clean, audit-ready assets.

When technical documentation is engineered for absolute clarity, the entire compliance workflow changes. Instead of treating manuals as an afterthought or a last-minute scramble before product launch, engineering teams gain a predictable mechanism that scales effortlessly across international borders. Every warning label, safety instruction, and compliance notice becomes structurally immune to local misinterpretation.

Ultimately, investing in rigorous linguistic standardisation protects your bottom line by removing friction from every stage of the product lifecycle. By bridging the gap between complex regulatory mandates and precise authoring standards, your organisation ensures that compliance is no longer a recurring operational risk, but a seamless competitive advantage.

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

To learn how to eliminate ambiguity from your technical documentation and protect your operational timelines, connect with the team at Shufrans TechDocs.

Across complex industrial operations—from commercial aerospace maintenance and energy plants to international engineering projects—the most persistent operational risk is rarely mechanical failure. It is linguistic failure.

When a manual instruction leaves room for interpretation, the human mind fills the gap. In high-stakes environments, that subjective judgment call turns into extended review cycles, execution variance, and heavy financial or safety exposure.

The Weight of Unspoken Words

Modern engineering ecosystems grow denser by the day. Complex supply chains span continents, multi-agency teams collaborate on technical missions, and field technicians execute intricate repairs under severe time pressures. Yet, the foundational medium connecting these moving parts remains human language.

When documentation relies on stylistic flair, varied vocabulary, or loose sentence structures, it creates a hidden cognitive tax. If three different technicians can interpret a single maintenance directive in three different ways, the system is fundamentally broken at the root.

The Root Cause of Operational Friction

In many organisations, technical writing is treated as an afterthought rather than a core engineering asset. Engineers focus heavily on the physical design or the software architecture, leaving the accompanying documentation to individual writing styles.

This decentralized approach leads to fragmented terminology across manuals, service bulletins, and training guides. Over time, these small inconsistencies accumulate, creating massive bottlenecks when teams try to scale their operations globally or onboard new partners.

What Linguistic Governance Solves

True operational efficiency begins with strict linguistic discipline. Proven frameworks like the ASD-STE100 specification strip away ambiguity. By enforcing a controlled vocabulary and strict structural rules, technical communication moves from an art form to a precise engineering instrument.

• Eliminating Execution Variance: Clear procedures ensure that a technical instruction means precisely the same thing in Singapore, Copenhagen, or Toulouse.
• Reducing Review Friction: Standardised writing cuts through endless editorial loops, allowing technical outputs to reach the field faster.
• Protecting Operational Integrity: Precision in writing directly protects safety margins, ensuring that critical steps in MRO and energy plants leave zero room for error.

Operating at Modern Scale

Operating in today’s fast-paced industrial environment means volumes of documentation are expanding faster than ever. In an era where information velocity is at an all-time high, the sheer scale of technical output makes discipline harder to maintain, yet infinitely more vital. When organisations flood their ecosystems with raw volume without a governing standard, they scale up confusion rather than clarity.

Precision writing is no longer just about editing manuals. It is about protecting the entire operational chain from the ground up, ensuring that what is written on paper translates safely and accurately to the floor where the real work happens.

If you are curious about how these standards could look in your specific field, Shufrans TechDocs invites you to reserve a chat session.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

Let us make precision the new standard for technical success.

View our full training calendar and secure your spot here: https://www.shufrans-techdocs.com/events/

*Course fee includes exercises, learning aids, certificate of completion, and 120-day post-training support.

⁺⁺A group discount of up to €500 is applicable when two or more participants sign up for the same event. Send us your questions: enquiry@shufrans-techdocs.com.

🏷️ A €210 fee discount is applicable when you also sign up for 🆕 Certified STE Masterclass | Europe Online.

What’s Included & Incentives

• Inclusions: Course materials, practical exercises, learning aids, a certificate of completion, and 120 days of post-training support.

• Group Discount: Save up to €500 when two or more colleagues register for the same cohort.

• Bundle Offer: Receive a €210 fee discount when you also register for the upcoming Certified STE Masterclass | Europe Online.

• Enquiries: Have questions or need a custom corporate booking? Send us a message at enquiry@asd-ste100.net.

Summary of Simplified Technical English (STE)

Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) is the internationally recognised controlled language specification designed to make complex technical manuals clear, unambiguous, and easily understood by a global audience. In today’s enterprise landscape—where automated translation engines and AI-assisted workflows rapidly scale content output but also multiply linguistic errors—upstream standardisation is more critical than ever.

By eliminating ambiguity and enforcing strict syntactic control, STE protects your documentation pipeline, acts as a reliable grounding layer for automated systems, drastically reduces translation costs, and prevents costly operational risks. While often a formal requirement for aerospace and defence maintenance documentation, STE is readily adapted across all high-compliance technical industries. Led by Shumin Chen, this foundational training teaches participants how to correctly and effectively apply STE rules in practice, navigate common writing pitfalls, and correct the frequent misinterpretations of core guidelines that undermine technical quality.

Why select a Simplified Technical English training with Shufrans?

Shumin is a very knowledgeable STE instructor. She kept the course interesting and was always open to our questions/feedback. The introduction to Simplified Technical English has been greatly beneficial for my understanding of what the specification entails. In terms of preferred rules, I cannot pinpoint a specific set of STE writing rules as they are all valuable. This was my favorite part of the course as I enjoyed analyzing how other writers went about using STE to best apply it to their line of work.

The rewriting workshop in Simplified Technical English training Europe was my favorite part of the course as I enjoyed analyzing how other writers went about using STE to best apply it to their line of work. I would highly recommend this course to all technical writers. Shumin Chen takes the time to clearly explain the rules of STE. A very attentive instructor, indeed. If given the chance, I would really enjoy working along side her. Michael Palmieri, Documentation Specialist, AON3D | The Advanced Additive Manufacturing Platform

STE Course Outline*

We’re committed to providing the highest quality learning experience in all our online workshops. Therefore, we’ve made the decision to cap all our online workshop session sizes at just five participants, starting 5 May 2025.

This intimate virtual environment fosters richer discussions, more personalised feedback, and a greater overall impact on your understanding and application of key technical communication standards like Simplified Technical English. Learn better, communicate better, across all our courses. This two-day Online STE Workshop includes interactive training, exercises, and a 120-day post-training consultation.

Day 1: Classroom Training & Foundations

• Practical overview of Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) and why strict structural control is essential for modern technical documentation.

• How STE ensures absolute clarity for both native and non-native speakers across global audiences.

• The direct risk-mitigation and cost benefits of adopting the STE international writing standard in high-compliance environments.

• Core writing rules and how to apply them systematically in daily practice.

• Mastering the general vocabulary lexicon: Approved and unapproved words, and the strict structural rationale behind them.

• Eliminating ambiguous phrasing, noun clusters, and syntactic drift that undermine technical accuracy.

• Establishing a rigorous baseline for clear, human-readable documentation that withstands automated review and translation workflows.

Day 2: Practical Application, Review, & Exercises

• How to deal with industry-specific terminology and integrate specialised nouns safely into controlled writing.

• How to apply STE across various documentation types (such as maintenance manuals, service bulletins, and operating procedures).

• How to implement STE frameworks with minimal disruption to ongoing production and existing documentation archives.

• Practical hands-on workshop session for applying strict STE rules directly to your own company documents.

• Systematic review, live editorial breakdown, and discussion of participants’ own documents to reinforce learning.

• Collaborative review of common error patterns and alternative phrasing solutions.

• Final classroom presentation of edited documents to establish a repeatable, high-integrity quality standard for your team, directly reducing the cost of creating and maintaining technical publications.

*Shufrans also offers customised ASD-STE100 training solutions tailored to meet your specific requirements. These courses are normally provided at the customer’s premises.

Who should attend this Simplified Technical English training?

• Executive Leadership & Strategy: CIOs, CTOs, COOs, and Compliance Managers

• Documentation & Editorial Leads: Documentation Managers, Editors, and Technical Writers

• Engineering & Technical Specialists: Engineering Managers, SMEs, Software Research Engineers, Service Engineers, and AI Content Engineers

• Operations & Support Teams: Maintenance, ILS, Operation, Product, and Project Managers, plus Customer Support

• Training & Content Creation: Instructional Designers, Translators, Translation Managers, and Technical Illustrators.

What technical writing outcomes to expect?

Our interactive training, exercises, and workshop will equip participants to standardise content and achieve measurable operational outcomes:

• Enhanced Communication & Efficiency: Authors will gain the structural discipline required to create clear, consistent, and easily translatable technical documentation—providing a reliable grounding layer for automated translation engines and AI-assisted workflows, facilitating seamless global communication, and streamlining the authoring process.

• Improved Operational Safety & Reduced Downtime: By mastering STE principles, teams will produce unambiguous documentation that eliminates procedural misunderstandings, directly safeguarding operational safety and driving a measurable reduction in costly AOG/downtime and human error.

• Optimised Lifecycle Support & Cost Reduction: Standardisation enables modular writing, semantic consistency, and efficient content reuse. This optimises product lifecycle support, future-proofs documentation against shifting publishing stacks, and significantly reduces the overall cost of creating and maintaining technical publications.

What customers are saying..

The introduction in Simplified Technical English training Europe was a good and concise way to familiarize yourself with STE basics. I’ve a background in plain language, so for example the rule on noun clusters makes perfect sense. I’m all about simplification, so substituting verbs like “eliminate” for verbs like “remove” or “stop” will be my new quest. The STE exercises were helpful in getting to grasp with STE during the training workshop. I’d very likely recommend this course to anyone planning to introduce STE as it’s got a great practical angle. Jenni Virtaluoto, PhD, Senior Lecturer, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

ASD-STE100 Trainer’s qualifications

Ms. Shumin Chen, principal trainer and consultant at Shufrans TechDocs, received her professional on-the-job training in the field of Simplified Technical English under the tutelage of Dr Frans Wijma, a renowned linguist and documentation expert. Together as an experienced global team, they combined their expertise to benefit enterprise clients worldwide, having delivered training and consultancy services to over 200 companies to date. Shufrans TechDocs stands as an industry leader with unmatched depth of experience in providing certified Simplified Technical English training in Europe.

Shumin has guided numerous organisations through their complex documentation and standardisation needs. Although STE was originally developed for the aerospace industry—specifically for aircraft maintenance manuals—she has successfully demonstrated that its foundational principles provide an essential governance framework across a wide range of technical sectors, including machinery, IT, automotive, energy, and medical equipment.

As enterprises increasingly deploy automated translation engines, LLMs, and AI-assisted content workflows, Shumin’s approach proves that strict linguistic control is more vital than ever. Because structural clarity and syntactic discipline are universally required, few, if any, changes to the specification are necessary to adapt STE as a reliable upstream grounding layer for modern digital and AI-driven publishing stacks.

*Course fee includes exercises, learning aids, certificate of completion, and 120-day post-training support.

⁺⁺A group discount of up to €500 is applicable when two or more participants sign up for the same event. Send us your questions: enquiry@asd-ste100.net.

🏷️ A €210 fee discount is applicable when you also sign up for 🆕 Certified STE Masterclass | US Canada Online.

Summary

Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) is a controlled language designed to make technical manuals clear, unambiguous, and easily understood by a global audience. Mandated or recommended by key military and commercial specifications, STE reduces translation costs and serves as a vital upstream grounding layer for automated translation engines and AI workflows.

Led by Ms. Shumin Chen (Shufrans TechDocs), this training guides participants through the correct and effective practical application of STE, addressing common writing errors and the frequent misapplication of core rules across all technical industries.

For enquiries and registration: enquiry@asd-ste100.net

Course outline*

We are committed to providing the highest quality learning experience across all our online workshops. To ensure richer discussions, deeper document reviews, and maximum individual impact, all online workshop sessions are strictly capped at just five participants.

This intimate virtual environment fosters precise feedback and mastery of key technical communication standards like Simplified Technical English. Each three-day online workshop includes interactive training, hands-on exercises, and a dedicated 120-day post-training consultation period.

Day 1: Classroom Training & Foundations

• Practical overview of Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100)

• How STE ensures absolute clarity for both native and non-native speakers across global networks

• Strategic risk-mitigation and cost benefits of adopting the STE standard

• Core writing rules and systematic daily application

Day 2: Application & Vocabulary

• Navigating the general vocabulary dictionary

• Approved versus unapproved words and the structural rationale behind them

• Handling industry-specific terminology and specialised nouns safely

• Applying STE across diverse manuals, service bulletins, and operating procedures

Day 3: Review, Implementation, & Exercises

• Hands-on workshop session applying strict rules to your own corporate materials

• Live editorial review, breakdown, and discussion of participant texts

• Implementing frameworks with minimal disruption to ongoing production and legacy documentation

• Classroom presentation and restructuring of participant documents to reinforce mastery

*Shufrans also offers customised ASD-STE100 training solutions tailored to meet your specific corporate requirements, normally delivered on-site at customer premises.

What customers are saying..

I was looking forward to the training and was not disappointed. I think that the training was valuable and would recommend that my colleagues take the training either on line or in person. Being able to send a sample document and then working on it together using my new STE skills was very helpful and valuable. Shumin was extremely knowledgeable and gave many practical examples. I hope to be able to make use of the support period post-training. Deborah Tonkin, Technical Information Engineer, Komatsu

Why select a Simplified Technical English training with Shufrans?

The introduction to ASD-STE100 was good and informative for someone like me with zero knowledge of the STE standard before. Rule 6.3 in STE writing summarizes the best of what I can take with me. There was quite a lot from the STE exercises to consume regarding grammar. Nevertheless, the worksheets were very good and helpful. I gained quite a lot of knowledge from them and they were the best part of this training workshop. Shumin was very professional and sharp as a razor. The best takeaway for me from her workshop is to give more thought to how I build my sentences rather than focussing on specific ‘allowed’ or ‘approved’ words. Jeppe Friis, Technical Inspector, Maersk Drilling Maintenance Support

Who should attend this ASD-STE100 workshop?

What ASD-STE100 workshop training outcomes to expect?

Our interactive training, exercises and workshop, will teach participants to standardise content to:

• Enhanced Communication & Efficiency: Authors will gain the skills to create clear, consistent, and easily translatable technical documentation, facilitating effective communication with a global audience and streamlining the writing process.
• Improved Operational Safety & Reduced Downtime: By mastering STE principles, teams will produce unambiguous documentation that minimises misunderstandings, directly contributing to improved operational safety and a reduction in costly AOG/downtime.
• Optimised Lifecycle Support & Cost Reduction: Training will enable modular writing and content reuse, leading to maximised consistency, optimised product lifecycle support, and a significant reduction in the overall cost of creating and maintaining technical publications.

ASD-STE100 Trainer’s qualifications

Ms. Shumin Chen, principal trainer & consultant at Shufrans TechDocs received her professional on-the-job training in the field of STE under the tutelage of Dr Frans Wijma, a linguist and documentation expert. Together as an experienced global team, they provided their combined knowledge and dedication to benefit customers worldwide. To date, they have provided training and consultancy services to over 180 companies. Shufrans TechDocs is the only company with such vast experience in providing certified STE training.

Shumin has supported various companies with their STE and other documentation needs, based on standards where possible. Although STE was developed for the aerospace industry, more specifically for aircraft maintenance documentation, Shumin found that it made a lot of sense to apply the same principles to other industries and types of documents as well. Few -if any- changes to the specification are necessary to adapt STE to industries ranging from machinery to IT, automotive to medical equipment.

Course fee includes exercises, learning aids, certificate of completion, and 120 days of post-training support.

Group discounts of up to €500 are available when two or more participants register from the same company. An additional €210 fee discount applies when your team also registers for the 🆕 Certified STE Masterclass | Asia Pacific (APAC) Online..

For enquiries and registration, contact us at enquiry@asd-ste100.net.

Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) is a controlled language designed to make technical manuals clear, unambiguous, and easily understood by a global audience. Mandated or recommended by specifications like MIL-STD-3048, S1000D, and ATA iSpec 2200, STE makes translations cheaper and more accurate while ensuring structural completeness.

In today’s digital landscape, STE also serves as the essential upstream grounding layer for automated translation engines, LLMs, and RAG pipelines, preventing syntactic drift and hallucinations. While a formal requirement for aerospace and defence maintenance, its rigorous principles are easily adapted across all technical industries. Led by Shumin Chen, this training teaches participants how to apply STE rules correctly in practice, avoid common writing pitfalls, and eliminate hidden operational risks.

The ASD-STE100 workshop conducted by Shufrans TechDocs made for a very good introduction to STE for new as well as intermediate users of the STE writing standard. The presentation on rules was very clear and I liked the emphasis on the fact that the rules are weighted and how one can use them flexibly. The exercises completed during this training were good and provided real world examples in technical writing in a practical way. I’d very likely recommend this course to someone else. This course is a must for any new technical writers or technical publication employees. Neil Winson, Technical Writer, Airbus Helicopters

MEA Online STE Workshop Course Outline*

We are committed to providing the highest quality learning experience across all our online workshops. To ensure richer discussions, deeper document reviews, and maximum individual impact, all online workshop sessions are strictly capped at just five participants.

This intimate virtual environment fosters precise feedback and mastery of key technical communication standards like Simplified Technical English. Each two-day online workshop includes interactive training, hands-on exercises, and a dedicated 120-day post-training consultation period.

Day 1: Classroom Training & Foundations

• Practical overview of Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100)

• How STE ensures absolute clarity for both native and non-native speakers across global networks

• Strategic risk-mitigation and cost benefits of adopting the STE standard

• Core writing rules and systematic daily application

• Navigating the general vocabulary dictionary

• Approved versus unapproved words and the structural rationale behind them

Day 2: Practical Application, Review, & Exercises

• Handling industry-specific terminology and specialised nouns safely

• Applying STE across diverse manuals, service bulletins, and operating procedures

• Implementing frameworks with minimal disruption to ongoing production and legacy documentation

• Hands-on workshop session applying strict rules to your own corporate materials

• Live editorial review, breakdown, and discussion of participant texts

• Classroom presentation and restructuring of participant documents to reinforce mastery

*Shufrans also offers customised ASD-STE100 training solutions tailored to meet your specific corporate requirements, normally delivered on-site at customer premises.

Who should attend this Simplified Technical English training?

• Executive & Strategy: CIOs, CTOs, COOs, Compliance and Quality Managers

• Documentation & Editorial: Documentation Managers, Editors, Technical Writers, Technical Illustrators, and Graphics Specialists

• Engineering & Technical: Engineering Managers, SMEs, Software Research Engineers, and Engineers who create documentation

• Operations & Support: Maintenance, ILS, Operation, Product, and Project Managers, plus Customer Support Managers

• Training, Translation & Content: Translation Managers, Translators.

What training outcomes to expect?

Enhanced Communication & Efficiency: Authors will gain the structural discipline required to create clear, consistent, and easily translatable technical documentation—providing a reliable grounding layer for automated translation engines and AI-assisted workflows, facilitating seamless global communication, and streamlining the authoring process.

Improved Operational Safety & Reduced Downtime: By mastering STE principles, teams will produce unambiguous documentation that eliminates procedural misunderstandings, directly safeguarding operational safety and driving a measurable reduction in costly AOG/downtime and human error.

Optimised Lifecycle Support & Cost Reduction: Standardisation enables modular writing, semantic consistency, and efficient content reuse. This optimises product lifecycle support, future-proofs documentation against shifting publishing stacks, and significantly reduces the overall cost of creating and maintaining technical publications.

ASD-STE100 Trainer’s qualifications

Ms. Shumin Chen, Principal Trainer and Consultant at Shufrans TechDocs, received her professional on-the-job training in Simplified Technical English under the tutelage of Dr Frans Wijma, a renowned linguist and documentation expert. Together as an experienced global team, they have delivered training and consultancy services to over 200 companies worldwide. Shufrans TechDocs stands as an industry leader with unmatched depth of experience in providing certified STE training.

Shumin has guided numerous organisations through their complex documentation and standardisation needs. Although STE was originally developed for the aerospace industry—specifically for aircraft maintenance manuals—she has successfully demonstrated that its foundational principles provide an essential governance framework across a wide range of technical sectors, including machinery, IT, automotive, energy, and medical equipment.

As enterprises increasingly deploy automated translation engines, LLMs, and AI-assisted workflows, strict linguistic control is more vital than ever. Because structural clarity and syntactic discipline are universally required, few, if any, changes to the specification are necessary to adapt STE as a reliable upstream grounding layer for modern digital and AI-driven publishing stacks.