News & Events | Shufrans TechDocs Home // News & Events | Shufrans TechDocs

Winning a major industrial or defence tender requires flawless, claim-safe copy that satisfies procurement boards, political stakeholders, and regulatory committees. Yet, once the contract is secured and the system transitions from the boardroom to the field, the marketing prose stops mattering. What determines the success or failure of a multi-million-dollar deployment is whether an operator on a crowded hangar deck or a technician in a multi-plant manufacturing facility can execute a complex maintenance procedure without hesitation or misinterpretation.

The vulnerability usually begins the moment a winning proposal is handed over to engineering and localisation teams. Many global enterprises pour vast resources into crafting watertight tender documents, only to watch their internal documentation fragment the moment it crosses international borders and undergoes translation. As artificial intelligence content, rapid localisation tools, and multi-sourced spec sheets continue to expand the sheer volume of written material, organisations face a critical operational blind spot: producing more documentation does not equal operational clarity. In fact, it often compounds the risk.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

If your organisation is looking to bridge the gap between boardroom promises and plant-floor reality, Shufrans TechDocs specialises in implementing rigorous ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English standards from the ground up. Get in touch to discuss how we can secure your procedural clarity.

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

When an engineering firm releases a complex system, product variants quickly follow. The core architecture remains identical, but a control panel shifts, a valve location moves, or a feature appears on one variant and not the next.

Documentation follows the same chaotic cycle. Early on, the technical author copies the previous manual, edits what changed, and ships. That approach holds up until the number of variants multiplies, at which point systemic symptoms appear. The same pressure-relief valve is described one way by the mechanical team and another by the electrical group. A safety correction made for a high-priority client never reaches the technical files being built alongside it. Superseded specifications survive in sections nobody reread.

Standardising the layout and table of contents solves part of the problem. But when technical manuals are written in natural English, layout standardisation only creates an orderly wrapper for unconstrained ambiguity.

True technical standardisation requires controlling the language itself through Simplified Technical English. Here are the core pillars required to fix documentation drift at the authoring stage.

Enforce Controlled Terminology and Single Meanings When the same physical component appears under different names across a product family, readers assume they are dealing with different parts. A retention bracket can easily pick up four distinct labels across three variant manuals without anyone deciding it should. Designate a single, approved term of record for every asset, part, and action. STE rules dictate that every approved word must have only one meaning, and every concept must be represented by only one term. As soon as a part carries synonyms, users hesitate, internal consistency collapses, and downstream localisation costs multiply.

Standardise Procedural Voice and Sentence Shape Natural technical writing varies wildly depending on who is at the keyboard. One writer prefers passive descriptions, another uses imperative commands mixed with conditional clauses. Enforce structural rules for sentence design. Instructions must always begin with an approved imperative verb, placing the action in the first word. Descriptive sentences must keep the active voice and name the object that acts. By fixing sentence patterns across the document, technical readers stop parsing ambiguous grammatical structures and focus entirely on operational changes.

Standardise Safety Information and Hazard Formats Safety warnings are the one area where writer discretion introduces lethal exposure. When safety messages vary across models of the same family, it creates severe compliance liabilities during third-party safety audits or product liability disputes. Combine standard safety hierarchy rules with strict STE constraints.

Standardise Baseline Content Blocks A maintenance procedure or system check that applies across a dozen variants does not need to be drafted twelve times by twelve different engineers. Isolate approved, STE-compliant blocks of procedural text and turn them into modular standard content. When a function behaves identically under the same conditions, the verified sentence structure becomes a reusable master asset. If a specific operational threshold differs on a variant, change only that parameter and leave the rest of the certified sentence untouched.

Establish Upstream Writing Rules Over Downstream Localisation Many engineering organisations treat technical standardisation as a translation problem, fixing errors only after the manual has been written and sent overseas. By then, the structural ambiguity is already baked into the source text. Publish an internal style guide based on ASD-STE100 before writing begins. Define approved technical verbs, prohibit vague modifiers, and mandate strict sentence length limits. When the source text is written under strict linguistic governance, downstream translation and technical audits require a fraction of the time and budget.

Standardising technical manuals comes down to imposing rules that govern how a product family is described from the ground up. With over twenty years of specialised experience delivering Simplified Technical English implementation and training across complex industrial sectors, Shufrans TechDocs helps engineering teams eliminate documentation drift at the authoring stage.

With an STE-based standard in place, authoring time drops, review cycles shorten, and the quality gap between different engineering teams disappears. More importantly, technical files stop triggering non-conformities during regulatory audits, ensuring that your operational documentation matches the absolute precision of the hardware you build.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

Every time a new AI tool hits the market, the conversation shifts to what software can automate. We talk about translation speeds, draft generation, and automated summaries. We rarely talk about what happens when you feed messy, ambiguous documentation into a machine and let it scale your worst habits across every market you serve.

In sectors where a single maintenance error can shut down an entire rail network or ground a fleet, the challenge is no longer about generating more content. It is about control.

The Automation Trap

Organisations rushing to digitise legacy manuals or deploy automated translation workflows often assume technology will fix messy writing on the fly.

It does the exact opposite.

Generative tools amplify whatever they are given. If your source text is bloated, contradictory, or packed with local jargon, an AI model or machine translation engine will faithfully reproduce those flaws at scale, turning minor linguistic slips into systemic operational risks. When procedures span multiple languages and cross-border engineering teams, ambiguity is not just poor style, it is a financial and operational liability.

Why Structured Language Outperforms AI Guesswork

Engineering is deterministic. A technician on a shop floor or a mining site does not need a probable interpretation of a maintenance procedure. They need absolute clarity.

Controlling how technical information is authored solves this at the root:

• Machine Readiness: Clean, rule-based source text is the only reliable foundation for AI training and automated localisation.
• Zero Cognitive Load: Global teams and non-native speakers execute complex assembly and troubleshooting tasks faster when instructions leave zero room for guesswork.
• Risk Mitigation: Standardised authoring rules eliminate the vague phrasing that causes costly downtime, equipment damage, and compliance failures.

Training for the Age of AI

Software cannot take legal liability for a failed maintenance procedure. The technical writers, engineers, instructional designers, and editors who govern your documentation remain the critical gatekeepers of your bottom line.

If your teams are building out AI workflows without first tightening the quality of their source communication, you are simply automating errors. Investing in structured language training for engineers, writers, and translators ensures your operations stay resilient, compliant, and profitable in an automated world.

Are your teams relying on AI to fix bad documentation, or are you building the linguistic standards required to make automation actually work? Let’s discuss how targeted training can future-proof your operations.

🔗 Reserve a 30-min STE Feasibility Session: https://calendly.com/shufranstechdocs/30min

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

To learn how to eliminate ambiguity from your technical documentation and protect your operational timelines, connect with the team at Shufrans TechDocs.

When we think about aviation safety, our minds immediately go to mechanical reliability, strict engineering tolerances, and robust software systems. But there is a silent, less obvious vulnerability hiding inside the technical data layer of the global aviation supply chain, and that is linguistic ambiguity.

Every day, aircraft parts and technical data packages cross international borders. They are reviewed by major national bodies like the FAA and other Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs), and handled by engineers and technicians worldwide. Yet, the manuals that dictate how these aircraft are maintained are frequently riddled with subjective language that leaves room for dangerous guesswork.

The Danger of “Vague Words” in Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)

Consider how often words like “appropriate”, “sufficient”, “regularly”, or “carefully” creep into Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) or service bulletins.

To an author sitting at an OEM headquarters in one country, an instruction to “check the casing regularly for sufficient clearance” might seem perfectly obvious. But to a foreign regulator validating that data, or a local technician on a noisy hangar floor thousands of miles away, those words introduce a massive human guessing game.

What constitutes a “sufficient” check? How often is “regularly”? What passes a safety audit under one jurisdiction can easily be flagged as a compliance failure by another authority during a state-to-state validation process. This linguistic mismatch does more than just create safety blind spots. It causes immediate regulatory friction, bilateral validation backlogs, and costly aircraft return-to-service delays.

Why Software Checkers Aren’t a Silver Bullet

To combat this, many aerospace organisations look for a quick fix by deploying automated grammar checkers. While these tools are excellent at catching typos or banned words, they operate at the very end of the line. They are passive and reactive.

A software checker cannot evaluate whether a maintenance step is logically planned or operationally safe. If an engineer writes a confusing, ambiguous instruction, a checker will simply give you a grammatically correct version of a flawed step. It creates a false sense of compliance.

True risk prevention requires training human authors to think, structure, and write with absolute clarity from the very beginning, before a single word is ever typed into a system.

Preparing the Data Layer for the Next Generation of Tech

This issue is becoming even more critical as aviation authorities evaluate advanced systems, such as automated maintenance tracking and predictive diagnostic tools.

Modern technical documentation is no longer just for human eyes. It serves as the baseline data layer that digital systems read to predict part failures or track maintenance history. If that data layer is filled with inconsistent terminology and vague language, the automated systems get confused. This leads to data errors, hallucinations, and flawed safety conclusions. Standardising language is no longer just a paperwork exercise. It is about future-proofing your data for the next generation of aviation technology.

Eradicating Ambiguity at the Source

To maintain absolute safety and seamless compliance across borders, the aerospace industry relies on international linguistic standards like ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English). STE replaces guesswork with precise metrics, limits words to one specific meaning, and ensures instructions are completely unmistakable.

At Shufrans TechDocs, we help aerospace leaders secure total linguistic control over their operations. We move beyond passive software tools by providing expert, human-centric STE training and implementation programmes tailored directly to engineering teams. By standardising technical data at the source, we remove ambiguity to ensure your documentation is accurate for human operators, readable for automated systems, and fully compliant with global safety standards.

To learn how to eliminate ambiguity from your technical documentation and protect your operational timelines, connect with the team at Shufrans TechDocs.

In aviation engineering, linguistic clarity is a matter of operational safety and structural efficiency. Yet, a significant gap remains in how the aerospace ecosystem trains both incoming graduates and experienced engineers.

While technical training rightly focuses on avionics, airframe structures, and mechanical precision, the language used to document and maintain these systems is often treated as an afterthought. Engineering professionals frequently enter the workforce relying on standard, expressive English to write maintenance logs, repair reports, and service bulletins.

In a high-stakes MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) environment, linguistic ambiguity is a measurable operational risk. This is why global aerospace relies on ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English) to normalise technical data.

Embedding Safety into the Curriculum

Progressive technical training academies are shifting their approach, realising that training in international technical writing standards should not be treated as an afterthought or a post-employment luxury. Instead, they are integrating ASD-STE100 principles directly into basic aviation engineering and avionics curricula, specifically embedding it into foundational technical writing subjects.

By equipping students with these precise text standards from day one of their aviation careers, these forward-thinking academies ensure their graduates are industry-ready. For major MRO providers and aerospace manufacturers, hiring graduates who already understand controlled language provides an immediate operational advantage. It reduces internal training overheads, protects data integrity, and strengthens the maintenance safety chain from the point of entry.

However, achieving successful curriculum integration requires specialised, contextual execution. Applying a mass-market, one-size-fits-all approach to a safety-critical environment introduces distinct failure modes.

Evaluating the Risk of Passive Training Models

When organisations look to adopt ASD-STE100, procurement teams are often faced with a choice between specialist, interactive instruction and high-volume, pre-recorded distance-learning portals. While mass-enrolment online platforms are highly efficient for broad academic theory, data shows they underperform in high-compliance technical environments.

Technical documentation varies drastically across engineering sectors. An avionics curriculum faces entirely different documentation challenges and nomenclature than a heavy maintenance syllabus or a component overhaul pathway.

Evaluating the Risk of Passive Training Models

When organisations look to adopt ASD-STE100, procurement teams are often faced with a choice between specialist, interactive instruction and high-volume, pre-recorded distance-learning portals. While mass-enrolment online platforms are highly efficient for broad academic theory, data shows they underperform in high-compliance technical environments.

Technical documentation varies drastically across engineering sectors. An avionics curriculum faces entirely different documentation challenges and nomenclature than a heavy maintenance syllabus or a component overhaul pathway.

When instructors and engineers are subjected to generic, passive distance learning, several structural gaps emerge:

• Absence of Technical Context: Universal, “out-of-the-can” modules cannot adapt to complex, proprietary maintenance manuals or specific institutional curriculum frameworks.
• Lack of Synchronous Feedback: Controlled languages require behavioural change. Without real-time dialogue, learners cannot get immediate correction on their specific writing errors or clear up misinterpretations of the rules.
• Low Operational Retention: Passive, slide-clicking exercises rarely translate into practical compliance once the engineer or instructor returns to their daily workspace.

To truly transform an aviation curriculum or an engineering team, training must be delivered via dynamic, instructor-led frameworks that use the actual data structures of the institution. Every experience must be customised, not pre-recorded

Safeguarding the Investment: Why Post-Training Support is Critical

Adopting a controlled language standard like ASD-STE100 represents a profound behavioural shift. For educators integrating these principles into a new programme syllabus, or engineers writing live reports, the real test occurs weeks after the workshop concludes. The critical phase happens when a writer is sitting at their desk attempting to restructure lesson plans, design assessments, or rewrite highly complex technical manuals.

Without expert guidance during this transition period, documentation quality frequently degrades, and the initial training investment is lost.

This is why robust, expert-led instruction must be accompanied by an extended operational safety net. Incorporating dedicated, 120-day post-training remote support ensures that as personnel apply STE to live materials, they have access to expert validation and text review. This ongoing quality assurance is what bridges the gap between classroom theory and strict regulatory compliance.

Aviation safety begins with physical precision on the hangar floor, but it is sustained by absolute clarity in the technical record. To safeguard operations and future-proof talent pipelines, the aviation ecosystem must look past the convenience of canned distance education and invest in targeted, interactive precision.

To learn how to eliminate ambiguity from your technical documentation and protect your operational timelines, connect with the team at Shufrans TechDocs.

In the complex landscape of modern engineering and manufacturing, the concept of a digital thread is no longer a futuristic vision—it’s a fundamental requirement. From initial design to in-service maintenance, the digital thread connects vast amounts of data, enabling a seamless flow of information that drives efficiency, safety, and innovation. But what happens when this critical thread is woven with ambiguous, inconsistent language?

The answer is simple: its integrity is compromised.

While we invest heavily in cutting-edge technology—from machine learning to generative AI—we often overlook the most basic and powerful component of our data ecosystem: language. The quality of your data depends on its source. If that source is human-generated text, full of synonyms, idioms, and complex sentence structures, your advanced systems are built on an unreliable foundation. This is the “garbage in, garbage out” problem, and it directly undermines data integrity.

This is where a controlled language, specifically Simplified Technical English (STE), becomes your most valuable asset.

Beyond Documentation: STE as a Data Enabler

Many see STE as a tool for technical writing—a way to make manuals clearer and reduce translation costs. While this is true, it misses the far more profound strategic value. For Data Architects, Knowledge Engineers, and Information Architects, STE is a data standard.

• Fuelling the Knowledge Graph: A knowledge graph maps relationships between entities. It thrives on clear, unambiguous data. By enforcing a single, controlled vocabulary, STE ensures that concepts are described consistently across all documents. For example, “install a pump” will never be confused with “fit a pump.” This linguistic consistency provides a clean, structured source from which a knowledge graph can accurately infer relationships, leading to a richer, more reliable network of knowledge.

• Strengthening the Digital Thread: The digital thread’s power lies in its continuity. A consistent description of a component in a design specification, for example, must carry through to the assembly instructions, maintenance procedures, and even a fault report. STE acts as the linguistic backbone of this thread, ensuring that every piece of information remains clear and connected. This continuity is vital for predictive maintenance, supply chain optimisation, and efficient lifecycle management.
• Accelerating Machine Learning & NLP: Unstructured data is the biggest bottleneck for machine learning and natural language processing (NLP). The time and effort spent cleaning, normalising, and disambiguating text data is a significant cost. STE bypasses this problem entirely. By providing a pre-cleaned, logically structured dataset, it dramatically reduces the overhead for training AI models, allowing organisations to derive actionable insights faster and with greater confidence.

A Strategic Advantage

The strategic adoption of STE is not just an incremental improvement; it’s a step-change in how an organisation manages its knowledge. A commitment to data integrity from the linguistic layer upwards offers a significant competitive advantage.

It’s about a holistic approach—from the engineers who create the initial specifications to the product managers who oversee the lifecycle, and the compliance officers who need to ensure every step is traceable. STE is the common language that binds these roles together, ensuring that clarity, safety, and efficiency are built into the very fabric of the data itself.

The synergy of STE with modern data systems is undeniable. It’s the simple, consistent effort that delivers exponential returns, transforming small improvements into a powerful, enduring competitive advantage.

To learn more and begin your journey towards a more robust digital future, we invite you to explore the international standard and its practical application at www.asd-ste100.net.

Contact us today to explore how a partnership with Shufrans TechDocs can elevate your team to the next level of STE mastery.

🗓️ View our training calendar.

www.shufrans.com

In technical communication, precision is not just a preference; it is a professional and often safety-critical requirement. Mastering a discipline like Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) is a crucial step for any organisation committed to clear, unambiguous documentation. But how do you choose a path to true mastery?

For decades, the standard for professional training was a live, in-person experience—an environment where expertise was directly transferred, questions were answered in real time, and true skills were forged. While the digital age has made some knowledge accessible through pre-recorded sessions, true skill is not passively absorbed. It is forged through active engagement, nuanced feedback, and a dynamic exchange of expertise. The self-guided nature of asynchronous learning, while convenient, can often lack the critical components necessary for deep understanding and lasting proficiency.

The Invaluable Dynamic of Live Interaction

At Shufrans TechDocs, we believe that mastery is an art form best perfected through one-to-one guidance. Our approach is built on a 100% live, instructor-led, interactive training experience designed to transform your understanding from theoretical knowledge into applied skill.

Our sessions are structured as workshops, not lectures. You’ll work directly with a certified STE tutor, actively rewriting your own documentation and receiving instant, constructive feedback. We’ll answer your questions on the spot, clarify complex rules in the moment, and tailor the content to the specific challenges you face in your role. This hands-on, collaborative environment ensures you not only understand the rules but can confidently apply them to your work.

More Than Just a Course: The Shufrans Advantage

Choosing a training provider is a strategic decision, not just a transaction. In contrast to academic, self-paced courses that rely on pre-recorded videos and passive learning, our workshops demand your active participation. You are not just a viewer; you are a practitioner.

Furthermore, while some providers offer training built around a single software tool, we focus on empowering the writer. Our goal is to instil a foundational, human skill set that can be applied to any content or system, with or without a checker. This enduring expertise will outlast any software trial or subscription. The proficiency you gain in our sessions is truly yours for a lifetime.

Your Journey Doesn’t End with the Course

What happens when you’ve finished the training and are back at your desk, facing a challenging document? This is where many courses leave you high and dry.

That’s why our commitment to your success extends far beyond the final lesson. With every course, we provide 120-day post-training support, providing you with an invaluable safety net. This means you can continue to get expert guidance, ask follow-up questions, and seek help with real-world documentation challenges for months after your training is complete.

Global Reach, Local Convenience

We understand that technical teams are often spread across the globe. To accommodate your schedule and ensure a seamless learning experience, our live training workshops are offered across four different timezones: Europe, North & South America, Middle East & Africa, and Asia Pacific. You can choose the session that best fits your team’s location, allowing for real-time collaboration without the logistical headache.

An Investment in Your Team’s Excellence

Choosing a training provider is an investment in your team’s future. When you opt for live, interactive training, you are choosing more than a course—you are investing in a deeper, more profound learning experience.

Our training is designed around the core principles of ontology and schema. We believe that for every concept, there is a clear, single definition. This approach ensures that your team develops a shared mental model of every topic, from basic procedures to complex technical terms. The certification we provide is a testament to your skills and a distinction that is yours for a lifetime.

With Shufrans TechDocs, you empower your team with a globally recognised skill set, the confidence of a live tutor’s expertise, and a support system that lasts well beyond the final workshop.

Contact us today to explore how a partnership with Shufrans TechDocs can elevate your team to the next level of STE mastery.

🗓️ View our training calendar.

www.shufrans.com

The Challenge: Scaling Clarity in a Dynamic Software Environment

M-Files is a leader in intelligent information management, providing innovative software solutions that help organisations manage, find, and secure information more effectively. In the fast-paced software industry, where product updates are frequent and user bases are global, the clarity and precision of technical documentation are paramount. This is especially true for complex document management systems where user understanding directly impacts adoption, efficiency, and data integrity.

M-Files faced the ongoing challenge of ensuring that all its technical documentation—from user guides and administration manuals to API references and release notes—adhered to an uncompromising standard of clarity and consistency. As a growing company, this challenge was compounded by the need to:

• Continuously Onboard New Hires: Integrate new technical writers into the team while ensuring they quickly gained proficiency in M-Files’ established documentation standards, including STE.
• Maintain High Competence: Ensure that all technical writers, regardless of their tenure, consistently applied STE principles to produce unambiguous and highly effective content.
• Support Global Users: Deliver documentation that was easily understood by a diverse, international user base, minimising support queries and enhancing the user experience.

M-Files sought a partner capable of providing continuous, high-quality STE training that could seamlessly integrate into their agile development and talent acquisition processes, fostering a culture of sustained documentation excellence.

The Solution: Shufrans TechDocs’ Partnership for Continuous Improvement

Shufrans TechDocs has partnered with M-Files since 2020, establishing a long-term collaboration focused on continuous improvement in technical communication through ASD-STE100 (Issue 9) training. This ongoing programme is specifically designed to:

• Integrate into Onboarding: Provide new technical writing hires with comprehensive and practical STE training, ensuring they are immediately equipped to contribute high-quality, compliant documentation.
• Reinforce Best Practices: Offer regular refreshers and regular workshops to existing team members, ensuring consistent application of STE rules and addressing evolving documentation needs.
• Tailor to M-Files’ Context: Focus on practical application using examples relevant to M-Files’ specific software solutions and user scenarios, making the learning directly applicable.

Shufrans TechDocs’ commitment to M-Files extends beyond initial training sessions, fostering a continuous learning environment that supports the team’s professional development and ensures sustained adherence to the STE standard.

The Results: A Benchmark in STE Adoption and Documentation Excellence

M-Files’ dedication to continuous STE training with Shufrans TechDocs has yielded exceptional results, positioning them as a benchmark for effective STE adoption:

• Unparalleled Professionalism and Speed of Adoption: M-Files stands out as Shufrans TechDocs’ best-performing client in terms of their team’s professionalism and remarkable speed in acquiring and applying the intricacies of STE. This highlights their strong internal commitment to quality and efficient knowledge transfer.
• Consistently High-Quality Documentation: All technical writers, new hires and seasoned professionals alike, consistently produce clear, concise, and unambiguous documentation. This directly translates to improved user experience, reduced support queries, and enhanced customer satisfaction for M-Files’ global clientele.
• Seamless Onboarding for New Hires: New technical writers are rapidly brought up to speed on STE, allowing them to contribute effectively much faster, reducing ramp-up time and maintaining documentation output quality.
• Optimised Content for Global Reach: The consistent application of STE ensures that M-Files’ documentation is highly suitable for translation, leading to more accurate, efficient, and cost-effective localisation for their international markets.
• Empowered and Competent Team: M-Files’ technical writing team is highly competent and confident in applying STE, fostering a culture of precision and continuous improvement in their daily work.

Testimonials

The impact of this continuous training is clearly reflected in the feedback from M-Files’ technical writers:

Petra Rossi, Technical Writer at M-Files, shared: “I enjoyed the course immensely. In just two days, I think I became a better writer and got a new perspective on my work. I may not apply STE teachings diligently in all areas of life, but they will be a very useful set of tools in my kit. The trainer was very knowledgeable and competent, and quick to pick up on students’ unique strengths and improvement areas. I particularly liked active voice and the rule about phrasal verbs, which helped me look at text from a new perspective. As a fan of puzzles and tests, I enjoyed the quizzes and exercises, and it was very beneficial to apply the rules in practice right away.”

Maarit Nieminen, Technical Writer at M-Files, commented: ‘The workshop was very interesting and useful to my daily work. The quizzes were quite fun, and the worksheet exercises were particularly useful due to the valuable conversations they sparked. It was beneficial to receive feedback during the rewriting time, which will definitely aid the process during the training support period.”

Conclusion

M-Files’ long-standing partnership with Shufrans TechDocs for continuous ASD-STE100 training exemplifies a strategic commitment to documentation excellence. By integrating STE into their ongoing talent development and quality assurance, M-Files ensures that their technical documentation remains a powerful asset, consistently delivering clarity and precision to users worldwide and reinforcing their leadership in intelligent information management.

If your organisation seeks to cultivate a culture of continuous clarity and achieve documentation excellence, explore how Shufrans TechDocs can help. Learn more about our ASD-STE100 training and consulting services:

🗓️ View our training calendar.

www.shufrans.com

The Challenge: Precision in a World of Complex Machinery

VMI Group stands as a global leader in designing and manufacturing high-tech machinery for demanding industries, including tyre, rubber, can, and care products. Their sophisticated equipment requires technical documentation and training materials of the highest clarity and precision to ensure operational safety, efficient maintenance, and effective knowledge transfer across their worldwide customer base and internal teams.

However, as with many global enterprises dealing with intricate technology, VMI Group faced the challenge of maintaining absolute consistency and unambiguous language across their varied documentation outputs. This complexity was compounded by a diverse team of professionals involved in content creation, including:

• Instructional Designers & Curriculum Developers: Responsible for creating training materials that must be universally understood by operators and technicians.
• Technical Writers & Senior Technical Writers: Tasked with authoring detailed manuals, specifications, and service guides for highly specialised machinery.
• Linguists: Critical for ensuring accuracy in content that would inevitably be translated for international markets.
• Engineers: Providing essential technical input that needed to be integrated into clear, actionable documentation.

Inconsistencies or ambiguities in any part of this documentation chain could lead to inefficiencies, rework, increased translation costs, and, crucially, potential operational errors in the field.

The Solution: Shufrans TechDocs’ Tailored STE Training & Masterclass

VMI Group partnered with Shufrans TechDocs for a comprehensive, three-day ASD-STE100 training and masterclass. Understanding the mixed bag of roles and diverse work areas (including extrusion processes) involved, Shufrans TechDocs delivered a programme designed to provide both foundational STE principles and advanced application for VMI Group’s specific needs.

The training was structured as follows:

• Days 1 & 2 (Core STE Training): Covered fundamental STE principles, writing rules, and controlled vocabulary. This section was open to all participants.
• Day 3 (Masterclass for Advanced Participants): Exclusively for individuals who had previously completed an STE course, this session delved into more complex scenarios, nuanced application, and advanced best practices for implementing STE across varied technical content.

The training emphasised practical application, utilising VMI Group’s own documentation examples where relevant, to ensure immediate and tangible skill transfer. Shufrans TechDocs’ expertise in ASD-STE100 ensured that VMI Group’s teams were equipped with the latest standards and best practices.

The Results: Unifying Communication, Enhancing Operational Excellence

By undertaking the ASD-STE100 training and masterclass with Shufrans TechDocs, VMI Group achieved measurable advancements in its technical communication:

• Enhanced Documentation Clarity: All participants gained a unified understanding and application of STE, drastically minimising ambiguity in their technical documents and training materials. This directly translates to safer and more efficient machine operation and maintenance.
• Improved Content Efficiency: Technical writers and instructional designers could create content more quickly and with greater consistency, reducing drafting time and internal review cycles.
• Optimised Translation Workflows: Linguists gained highly consistent and unambiguous source text, leading to faster, more accurate, and more cost-effective translations for VMI Group’s global reach.
• Stronger Cross-Functional Understanding: Engineers and field experts, now familiar with STE, could provide more precise input, fostering better collaboration with documentation teams.
• Accelerated Professional Development: The training upskilled a broad range of professionals, enhancing their capabilities in critical communication, which is vital for continuous improvement in a high-tech manufacturing environment.

VMI Group’s investment in STE training with Shufrans TechDocs has proven to be a strategic move, empowering their teams to produce clear, consistent, and highly effective technical documentation and training materials, thereby supporting their commitment to innovation and global operational excellence.

If your organisation faces similar challenges in global technical communication, discover how Shufrans TechDocs can help. Learn more about our ASD-STE100 training and consulting services:

🗓️ View our training calendar.

www.shufrans.com