Technical writing & proofreading services | Shufrans TechDocs Home // Technical writing & proofreading services | Shufrans TechDocs

 

 

An important aspect of content development is technical writing. At Shufrans TechDocs, we focus on clarity in documentation. Therefore, we ensure that language is not an obstacle for users to read and understand the information to be conveyed.

 

 

Our team of experienced writers creates, edits and proofreads all types of technical publications, including:

 

Technical publications

  • Data sheets
  • Installation manuals
  • Job cards
  • Operator manuals
  • Quick reference manuals
  • Service Bulletins (SB)
  • Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
  • Training manuals
  • Troubleshooting manuals (TSM)
  • User manuals

Aerospace and defense publications

  • Aerospace and defense publications
  • Aircraft Maintenance Manuals (AMM)
  • Aircraft Schematic Manuals (ASM)
  • Component Maintenance Manuals (CMM)
  • Crew manuals
  • Data modules development & editing based on the ASD-STE100 standard
  • Flight Operations Manuals (FOM)
  • Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETM)
  • Interactive Electronic Technical Publications (IETP)

Scientific publications

  • Medical journals
  • Patents
  • Scientific articles

shufrans-laptop-vergence

Using international writing standards such as ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English), we help you ensure compliance where necessary while improving the consistency of your documentation and the possible re-use of previously created content. In addition, our terminology management methods ensure the correct and consistent use of your company-specific terms.

With over 30 years of relevant industry experience, our technical writing team takes pride in creating high quality content based on current international writing standards. As a result of our proven track record in addressing industry and corporate content development needs, many international companies entrust us with their documentation needs.

We are experienced in handling documentation according to specific regulatory, legal and technical requirements, including:

Shufrans’ other writing-related services include translation, DTP (page layout), publishing, typesetting and file format conversion. For more information, please refer to Technical Translations, DTP / Publishing and Document Conversion. The use of standards such as TMX, TBX, Unicode, CGM, XML and SGML ensures compatibility and an easy exchange of data.

 

 

 

 

Shufrans TechDocs Helps Great Companies Like Yours

 

Shufrans works with customers from the aerospace, defense, automotive, machinery and electronics industries. We have led development programs for customers worldwide, including BAE Systems, Boeing, EADS, Eurocopter, Embraer, GMF Aero-Asia, Rolls-Royce and Fuji Heavy Industries.

 

 

 

 

  • Keep doing what you’re doing - it’s a good subject and a very helpful class! I like the list of approved words. This could really help clarify and harmonize the writing in an organization. My other favourite STE rule being: Do not write noun clusters of more than 3 nouns. It helps when reading and writing texts also outside of STE.
    TCLoc Master's Programme Student University of Strasbourg
  • "No phrasal verbs" is my favorite rule. Forming phrasal verbs in the English language remains as one of my biggest challenges in English grammar. STE Rule 9.3 makes it easier for me to fully understand technical English sentences.
    TCLoc Master's Student Technical Communication and Localization
  • My fave STE Rule 3.6 - Active voice, as it is easy to spot and I like to figure out how to transform the sentence from active into passive voice I also liked working with the dictionary and finding and replacing words, I guess that's Rule 1.2. Yes - great information! Definitely an interesting course delivered by Shumin. Simplified Technical English Rules 1.2 and 1.3 were challenging because to always apply the intended meaning of a word and to use it as the approved part of speech and to select the correct words present in the dictionary can be tricky, but it's the activity I liked the most.
    Student at Master's TCLOoc in Technical Communication & Localisation. University of Strasbourg
  • The introduction was a good and concise way to familiarize yourself with STE basics. I’ve a background in plain language, so for example the rule on noun clusters makes perfect sense. I’m all about simplification, so substituting verbs like “eliminate” for verbs like “remove” or “stop” will be my new quest. The STE exercises were helpful in getting to grasp with STE during the training workshop. I'd very likely recommend this course to anyone planning to introduce STE as it’s got a great practical angle.
    Jenni Virtaluoto, PhD Senior Lecturer, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • Working with Shumin is a great pleasure because of her professional approach. Her knowledge of STE is excellent and with her pragmatic approach she helps companies to improve. Our trainees rated Shumin all with excellent. If you consider to train your staff in STE, I highly recommend Shumin.
    Henk Wijnands Founding Partner & Commercial Director, Foxiz BV
  • I have worked with Frans for a number of years now, first as a collaborator and later, alas, as a competitor. I have no hesitation in recommending him for his abilities as a linguist, polyglot, and technical innovator. In addition, he is an accomplished speaker, and a great salesman for his products. As someone who works closely with the ASD Simplified Technical English writing standard, I have been impressed with the breadth and depth of his knowledge of that subject. He is a world leader in the implementation of Controlled Language processes. So I am very happy to endorse him.
    Rick Wojcik Associate Technical Fellow, Boeing
  • Shumin did a very good job of explaining how the compliance in a language standard like STE varies from one industry to another, and is nothing like the law that enforces strict rules based on deterrence. Rather, it is a user-friendly standard that writers can turn to in times of need for consistency and standardising. My favourite STE rule is simply to use only approved technical words with the correct meaning and part of speech assigned.
    Noldi Odermatt, Geschäftsführer / Partner Aceon AG
  • The information presented was clear and succinct. Exercises provided helped me understand and grasp the concept of Simplified English from the very beginning of the training. A 10/10 rating from me. When it comes to rules about Simplified English writing, I very much like the use of active voice, having a list of approved verbs as a useful resource, and the encouraged use of pronouns (you, we, it, them). To me, clear rules are the bedrock of consistent text and document creation. I've found the STE exercises very useful since the examples in them are well focussed and cover issues we encounter in our daily work.  Overall, I have found this training workshop to be well-structured, Shumin came well prepared, was well organised, clear & an easy speaker to follow. Thank you for the great training!
    Sylvia Helfenstein Technical author, proofreader, Penpoint Text Editing Services GmbH
  • The introduction to Simplified Technical English (STE) was simple to follow and understand. Rule 1.4 to use only the approved forms of verbs and adjectives from the STE dictionary is something that I appreciate very much. Applying the rules faithfully was a challenging albeit enjoyable process. There is a lot of good writing rules to learn here. I've found the exercises to be very useful for learning reinforcement, and they have helped me to apply STE rules in a more efficient manner and I've gained a much better understanding of STE as a result. Shumin's training methodology is easy to follow, and she offers us great technical writing advice and has simplified the process for us. Every aspect of this training is a 10/10 for me.
    Nour Bazuhair Engineer Trainee, NIMR Automotive
  • I find that STE rule 2.1 extremely useful in technical documentation to avoid ambiguity. Rule 3.6 is one of my favorites because you need to master well syntax and language to always avoid passive voice. It was a good excercise, thanks Shumin for this interesting and challenging topic!
    Master's student, TCLoc for Technical Communication & Localisation University of Strasbourg